Consider When Hiring a Legal Consultant Services
Often when you hire an attorney, thinks he will solve everything. But given the nasty surprise that your process is not progressing and that counsel has not taken action to speed up the process. Begin the frustrations and bitterness begin with the lawyer for a process that takes more than 03 months without any procedural document.
However, this problem is that most lawyers who work alone begin to receive more cases than they can handle, including making false promises. It is therefore better to use professional staff working in a coordinated, orderly and harmonious for the best results for his clients. This is because they are better organized and specialized to handle a high volume of lawsuits.
Therefore, when hiring legal services you should consider loading processes and how much expertise is counted.
Senator Roy Barreras Resolved Legal Legal Framework for Peace
Senator Roy Barreras settled law of the Legal Framework for Peace, with constitutional status. Critics like Sen. Miguel Gomez Martinez pointed out that back door is opening an amnesty for the guerrillas because one article attributed to Congress the power to suspend the prosecution to people even if they have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity; and incidentally, creating the conditions for a demilitarized zone, as the law would allow certain individuals of the FARC and the ELN (Gomez says that these two letters are the first and last name of the Act) negotiate without any legal threat, its proposed in place of the Colombian territory they choose.
Indeed, in the center of the discussion is the concept of transitional justice, one of which is accepted definitions: “Transitional Justice is the set of legal and political actions that various countries have been used as remedies for gross violations of human rights . These include prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations programs and various institutional reforms. “
If Dr. Gomez is right, at least one element of transitional justice, criminal actions of the perpetrators, it would pretermitiendo, and would add that only some of them, those on the far left. But the new tax statements on television and radio said such a law could be applied to other armed groups, referring perhaps to the far-right paramilitaries.
Is it incompatible with a law of victims of murderers? The answer is it depends. Victims should be guaranteed the truth, redress, and the creation of truth commissions, so that they and the country know the magnitude of the tragedy. The concept of amnesty is politically incorrect today, when used in the traditional sense of forgiveness and forgetfulness. Now what is the relationship of justice and peace? Surely this is a fundamental right of a people and to get some think could be some concessions on the right to justice, including “amnesty” as proposed by Roy Barreras, modified in the sense of forgiveness without forgetting and truth and repair. And applicable to all armed actors.
But how are you action depends on the correlation of forces: if the state really strategically defeat the guerrillas, this could only negotiate the abandonment of weapons and implement a concept of justice to criminalize their actions, especially its war crimes and crimes against humanity that the force of truth and reparation. The question here is what the government’s perception of the conflict. Should be made explicit so that the country knows it and is not traded on the backs of the people, because many think that the negotiation process has begun and that the government has a position that is not talking to an opponent defeated. Concessions in this perspective would be of great cost to democracy
Does this scenario where are the military? The extreme left wants amnesty for their organizations but punishment for the army that fought. The harsh legal war is staged in Colombia today is proof of that. Today it is clear that there could be no benefit to the irregular not apply to the military, because we would be facing the paradox that those who defeated the illegal were the only ones who were defendants and convicted. Meanwhile, a military court to restore the morale of the armed forces is absolutely necessary.